<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Statements on End of Ken Garff Automotive Group Boycott</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.californiansagainsthate.com/2009/02/27/95/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.californiansagainsthate.com/2009/02/27/95/</link>
	<description>Fighting for marriage equality - Proposition 8</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:34:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gotommy</title>
		<link>http://www.californiansagainsthate.com/2009/02/27/95/comment-page-1/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>gotommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 22:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiansagainsthate.com/blog/wordpress/?p=95#comment-199</guid>
		<description>These &quot;statements&quot; don&#039;t actually state anything other than, &quot;People talked about stuff.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Why the vagueness and secrecy? What DID YOU GET in return?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Was it a negotiation to end a boycott or just a feel-good rap session?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;m sure everyone is glad that you folks personally seem to be satisfied that the boycott should end. But you&#039;re really not giving other interested parties any reason to share that view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These &#8220;statements&#8221; don&#8217;t actually state anything other than, &#8220;People talked about stuff.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why the vagueness and secrecy? What DID YOU GET in return?</p>
<p>Was it a negotiation to end a boycott or just a feel-good rap session?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure everyone is glad that you folks personally seem to be satisfied that the boycott should end. But you&#8217;re really not giving other interested parties any reason to share that view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

